Baby Einstein NOT beneficial? [Archive] - Sonoma County Moms

View Full Version : Baby Einstein NOT beneficial?


Administrator
05-02-2006, 09:39 AM
Benefits of Baby Einstein, other videos disputed

Group wants FTC to bar firms from claiming educational value

10:26 PM CDT on Monday, May 1, 2006


Associated Press
NEW YORK – A children's advocacy group filed a complaint Monday with the Federal Trade Commission contending that Baby Einstein and Brainy Baby, leading producers of videos for infants and toddlers, are marketing the products without evidence to support claims that they are beneficial.
The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood asked the FTC to prohibit the companies from making claims about the videos' educational benefits and to require that ads and packaging display the American Academy of Pediatrics' recommendation of no TV or videos for children under 2.
"These companies are exploiting parents' natural tendency to want what's best for their children, and their deceptive marketing may be putting babies at risk," said Alvin Poussaint, a Harvard Medical School psychiatrist and member of the advocacy group.
There was no immediate comment from Baby Einstein, which is owned by the Walt Disney Co.
Dennis Fedoruk, president and chief executive of Brainy Baby Co., said feedback from parents has been consistently positive since his family-owned company began making videos for infants in 1995.
The complaint assumes "that parents don't know what they're doing and can't make an intelligent decision for themselves," he said.
Mr. Fedoruk suggested that parents give little credence to the pediatrics academy's recommendation that children under 2 shouldn't watch television.
The complaint accuses the manufacturers of contending without corroboration that the videos have educational and developmental value. It cites ads and promotional materials such as a claim by Baby Einstein that its Baby Wordsworth video can help a toddler learn words in Spanish, French and English. It also cites a claim by Brainy Baby that its Peek-A-Boo video "helps nurture such important skills as object permanence, communication skills, cause and effect, language development and many others."
"In fact, preliminary research suggests that television is a poor tool for educating very young children," the complaint says.
Mr. Fedoruk denied that his company is making any farfetched claims. "We're not making promises that our videos will make your child a genius."

dacotahsgirl
05-02-2006, 09:56 AM
How ridiculous! I think that they can be very beneficial...I mean as long as your kids arent watching tv all day long...know what I mean?

Administrator
05-02-2006, 10:20 AM
A woman i know said this about it, and I think it makes COMPLETE sense...


It is not that they are bad really. Nor do I think that is the point that the group is trying to make.

The point is that the companies claim educational value with no study or support of the claim, in fact contrary to current studies indicating TV is not beneficial under age 2.

Like say fruit roll ups for example. (or any "treat" food) We all know they have more sugar than nutritional value and we can choose to give them to kids despite that- knowing they aren't great nutritionally- but they taste good and so we make compromise. Because lifeis about balance right? Now imagine fruit roll ups based their advertising on them being healthy, scientifically advanced, research supported, a brain food of sorts. Well- then that would be wrong. Because there is no evidence to back up their advertising and many would be buying tem as a nutrtional supplement of sorts, when they are closer to candy.

Similar with BE videos. We all know that one on one educational time is best for kids educationally, right? But it obviously isn't practical and so many choose to use TV in moderation because life is about balance. So it should be marketed as such, instead it is being marketed as brain food for babies. and that is where the problem comes in imo.

i'm not anti baby eintein either... we don't have a home TV but we do have a car tv for long trips and baby eintein is one of the "approved" dvd's on our list. I like it a lot! If they are watching TV, it is one I don't mind.

I guess it is just a matter of calling it educational. School is educational, real life is educational, but there is nothing scientific to support hte claims that any tv is educational. Even the best tv options out there.

Does that make any sense?

Lynette
05-02-2006, 01:27 PM
I see what she means about not having support behind their claims, although we have some BE DVD's I never thought, "I must have this or Alaina is doomed to be a moron!"

FWIW- the Signing Time videos have taught her signs and the verbal words for some objects so I dunno about not learning *anything* from TV. Oh, and then Sesame Street, she can point all the characters out but I dunno if that will be on her SAT's or get her into Mensa <g>

daisydoc
05-02-2006, 01:39 PM
Everyone as an opinion and as a parents we get to choose what we want out kids watching or not watching. Personally I love Baby Einstein and have every single DVD in the collection. Now Sevannah doesn't watch them everyday or all day long but they helped her learn her animals (Baby McDonald and Baby Neptune); they have helped her start to learn sign language (Baby Wordsworth); they have helped her learn body parts (Baby DaVinci)... I could go on. But it's not like I sit her in front of the TV and leave the room. We watch them together and interact with one another to facilitate learning and if we have an item in the house that "matches" what we are watching I have her find it. Like the one mom's response Jackie posted... and like all things in life... moderation and execution are the keys.